Out of each of the studies I have planned, trying to utilise the data and information that I have learnt from the other studies together in such a way that we may highlight particular patterns that are linked with early cognitive or motor declines that can be potentially used as an early bio-marker is the hardest to draw to a conclusion that seems to make sense.
My current thinking is that we can't simply analyse the proteomic results, find particular protein aberrations, then analyse a younger sample ie 30 year olds, to see if the same proteins are showing any form of change or impairment. The problem is that the sample may be taken randomly from a younger person who may never go on to develop any form of neurodegenerative disease.
So how to overcome this dead end issue. We know from other studies that mitochondrial disease is definitely linked to other diseases such as coronary, vascular disease, diabetes, schizophrenia etc. which also have a higher correlation of being linked as comorbid diseases with Parkinson's disease.
By the time someone presents with Parkinson's they have already lost around 80% of their dopaminergic neurons, and research has indicated that this damage has been occuring over a period of upto 15 years. So if we can we identify a younger sample from individuals already showing signs of these other comorbid diseases and take our samples from this cohort, then this may increase the probability that some of the cohort will go on to develop Parkinson's in the future. An alternative tho this would be to run a cognitive battery of tests over the younger cohort and use samples that show cognitive changes compared to the test norm.





